Du verlinkst da auf YT auf die Stelle, wo ein Steve Kirsch redet. Mag ja schlau sein, keine Ahnung. Behauptet eine Menge gemacht zu haben, ich kannte den bis gerade nicht (
https://www.treatearly.org/team/steve-kirsch).
Mediziner, Pharmakologe, Virologe, Epidemiologe oder Public Health Experte scheint er nicht zu sein.
Warum redet der überhaupt da?
Weil er Gründer von
https://www.treatearly.org/ ist. OK, schauen wir mal nach, was die tun:
"We're on a mission to find an existing drug or drug combination that, when given early, reduces hospitalization and fatality rates by 75% or more."
OK, klingt gut, von mir aus.
"Our Solution: Identify early treatments by funding outpatient clinical trials of the most promising existing drugs."
OK, gerne. Sollen sie machen. Warum er gegen Impfungen ist, weiss ich nicht. Aber seine Initiative impliziert, dass Impfungen nicht als gute Lösung gesehen werden - sein gutes Recht.
Ist er ein Experte? Sind seine Behauptungen sicher wahr? Hat die FDA das bestätigt?
Nö, alles nicht.
Schauen wir mal, was Reuters dazu recherchiert hat:
Quelle:
https://www.reuters.com/article/factche ... SL1N2QP18K
Nur ein paar Auszüge:
Reuters hat geschrieben:
Fact Check-COVID-19 vaccines do not kill more people than they save; FDA experts did not make this false claim
(...)
An article shared more than 7,500 times online has claimed “FDA experts” revealed in a recorded meeting that COVID-19 vaccines kill more people than they save. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) told Reuters these claims were false – and that the individual who made them was not a member of the agency.
(...)
He makes a number of claims, including that COVID-19 vaccines are unsafe and that they kill more people than they save, before estimating the number of deaths to be around 150,000 (Kirsch’s slideshow: here).
Firstly, Kirsch is not and has never been an FDA employee or member of the VRBPAC, the FDA told Reuters in an email. The U.S. entrepreneur had submitted a request to speak at the open public hearing section of the meeting, which is open to anyone, as detailed in the agency’s announcement (here).
The spokesperson added: “FDA does not screen remarks from speakers during the open public hearing portion of the meeting in advance.
“Furthermore, the statements made by Mr. Kirsch during the open public hearing portion of the meeting were not based in science and go against FDA’s public health mission.”
(...)
Reuters presented these calculations to the FDA, who said: “FDA strongly disagrees with the analysis Mr. Kirsch put forth during the VRBPAC meeting, as we believe the data from VAERS that he referenced were not properly interpreted.”
They added: “Although under reporting is a limitation in VAERS with regard to COVID-19 vaccine safety monitoring, there currently is not evidence to suggest it would underestimate the amount of COVID-19 vaccine-related deaths to such a large degree.”
(...)
A CDC spokesperson told Reuters in an email: “To date, CDC has not detected any unusual or unexpected patterns for deaths following immunization that would indicate that COVID vaccines are causing or contributing to deaths, outside of the 3 confirmed deaths following the Janssen vaccine.”
VERDICT
False. COVID-19 vaccines are safe and not causing more deaths than they prevent. The claim is based on misinterpreted data.
(...)
Ehrlich gesagt würde ich ja eher der FDA folgen als Herrn Kirsch.
